Review



rabbit polyclonal anti integrin α6  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit polyclonal anti integrin α6
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Integrin α6, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 127 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/Integrin+alpha6+Antibody/pmc12042775-246-107-114
    Average 95 stars, based on 127 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti integrin α6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Western Blot:

    Article Title: Extracellular vesicles adhere to cells primarily by interactions of integrins and GM1 with laminin
    Article Snippet: .. The following primary antibodies were used for western blotting: mouse monoclonal anti-β actin 15G5A11/E2 (1:5,000, Cat# MA1–140; Thermo Fisher Scientific), mouse monoclonal anti-CD63 8A12 (1:1,000, Cat# SHI-EXO-M02; Cosmo Bio), mouse monoclonal anti-CD81 B11 (1:500, Cat# SC166029; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit monoclonal anti-CD9 EPR23105-125 (1:1,000, Cat# ab263019; Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-CD151 11G5a (1:250, Cat# ab33315; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-fibronectin (1:1,000, Cat# F3648; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit monoclonal anti-GAPDH 14C10 (1:2,000, Cat# 2181S; Cell Signaling), rabbit monoclonal anti-integrin α2 EPR5788 (1:2,500, Cat# ab133557; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin α3 (1:500, Cat# ab190731; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin α5 (1:250, Cat# 4705S; Cell Signaling), rabbit monoclonal anti-integrin α5 clone EPR7854 (1:500, Cat# ab150361; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin α6 (1:500, Cat# 3750S; Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin α7 (1:500, Cat# ab203254; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin αV (1:500, Cat# ab117611; Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-CD29 Clone 18 (1:2,000, Cat# 610467; BD Bioscience), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin β3 (1:500, Cat# AB2984; Millipore), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin β4 (1:500, Cat# 4707S; Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin β5 (1:500, Cat# 4708S; Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-laminin 1+2 (1:1,000, Cat# ab7463; Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-laminin clone 2E8 (1:500, Cat# MAB1920; Millipore), mouse monoclonal anti-talin-1 97H6 (1:500, Cat# GTX38972; Gene Tex), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-talin (Ser425), (1:250, Cat# TP4171; ECM Biosciences), mouse monoclonal anti–kindlin-2 clone 3A3 (1:500, Cat# MAB2617; Sigma-Aldrich), and anti-GM3 antibody clone GMR6 (1:1,000, Cat# A2582; Tokyo Chemical Industry), along with biotin-conjugated cholera toxin B subunit (CTXB; 1:500, Cat# 112; List Labs). .. Additionally, goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (1:5,000, Cat# 12–349; Millipore), donkey anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:4,000, Cat# NA934; Cytiva), goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:10,000, Cat# A0545; Sigma-Aldrich), goat anti-mouse IgM antibody-HRP (1:10,000, Cat# 31440; Invitrogen), and rabbit anti-biotin antibody-HRP clone D5A7 (1:10,000, Cat# 5571; Cell Signaling) were used as secondary antibodies.

    Article Title: Extracellular vesicles adhere to cells primarily by interactions of integrins and GM1 with laminin.
    Article Snippet: .. The following primary antibodies were used for western blotting: mouse monoclonal anti-β actin 15G5A11/E2 (1:5,000, Cat# MA1–140; Thermo Fisher Scientific), mouse monoclonal antiCD63 8A12 (1:1,000, Cat# SHI-EXO-M02; Cosmo Bio), mouse monoclonal anti-CD81 B11 (1:500, Cat# SC166029; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit monoclonal anti-CD9 EPR23105-125 (1: 1,000, Cat# ab263019; Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-CD151 11G5a (1:250, Cat# ab33315; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal antifibronectin (1:1,000, Cat# F3648; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit monoclonal anti-GAPDH 14C10 (1:2,000, Cat# 2181S; Cell Signaling), rabbit monoclonal anti-integrin α2 EPR5788 (1:2,500, Cat# ab133557; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin α3 (1:500, Cat# ab190731; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin α5 (1:250, Cat# 4705S; Cell Signaling), rabbit monoclonal anti-integrin α5 clone EPR7854 (1:500, Cat# ab150361; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin α6 (1:500, Cat# 3750S; Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin α7 (1:500, Cat# ab203254; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin αV (1:500, Cat# ab117611; Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-CD29 Clone 18 (1:2,000, Cat# 610467; BD Bioscience), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin β3 (1:500, Cat# AB2984; Millipore), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin β4 (1:500, Cat# 4707S; Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-integrin β5 (1: 500, Cat# 4708S; Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-laminin 1+2 (1:1,000, Cat# ab7463; Abcam), mouse monoclonal antilaminin clone 2E8 (1:500, Cat# MAB1920; Millipore), mouse monoclonal anti-talin-1 97H6 (1:500, Cat# GTX38972; Gene Tex), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-talin (Ser425), (1:250, Cat# TP4171; ECM Biosciences), mouse monoclonal anti–kindlin-2 clone 3A3 (1:500, Cat# MAB2617; Sigma-Aldrich), and anti-GM3 antibody clone GMR6 (1:1,000, Cat# A2582; Tokyo Chemical Industry), along with biotin-conjugated cholera toxin B subunit (CTXB; 1:500, Cat# 112; List Labs). .. Additionally, goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (1:5,000, Cat# 12–349; Millipore), donkey anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:4,000, Cat# NA934; Cytiva), goat anti-rabbit IgGHRP (1:10,000, Cat# A0545; Sigma-Aldrich), goat anti-mouse IgM antibody-HRP (1:10,000, Cat# 31440; Invitrogen), and rabbit anti-biotin antibody-HRP clone D5A7 (1:10,000, Cat# 5571; Cell Signaling) were used as secondary antibodies.

    other:

    Article Title: Astrocyte-derived small extracellular vesicles promote synapse formation via fibulin-2-mediated TGF-β signaling
    Article Snippet: Rabbit polyclonal anti-Integrin α6 , Cell Signaling , Cat# 3750; RRID:AB_2249263.



    Similar Products

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit polyclonal anti integrin α6
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Integrin α6, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/Integrin+alpha6+Antibody/pmc12042775-246-107-114
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti integrin α6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit polyclonal anti integrin α6 cell signaling technology 3750s n a
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Integrin α6 Cell Signaling Technology 3750s N A, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/Integrin+alpha6+Antibody/pmc10356808__41467_2023_39945_MOESM1_ESM-106-115-119
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti integrin α6 cell signaling technology 3750s n a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti-α6 integrin rabbit polyclonal antibody
    PMP22 expression differentially regulates select <t>integrin</t> pairs . The surface expression of <t>α6,</t> αvβ3, or α2 integrin in HEC-1A/PMP22, HEC-1A/Vector, or HEC-1A/PMP22 siRNA cells was determined using flow cytometry. The MFI was quantitated and tabulated in the top corner of each histogram. Upregulation of PMP22 promoted the surface expression of α6 integrin, while slightly reducing αvβ3 integrin. Reciprocal effects were seen with the PMP22 specific siRNA. In contrast, no change in α2 integrin expression was observed when PMP22 expression was modulated. The experiment was repeated three times, and a representative experiment is shown. Statistical differences between α6 integrin (B) and αvβ3 (C) expression were determined between the three cell lines. *, p < 0.05; Student's unpaired t test.
    Anti α6 Integrin Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/Integrin+%CE%B16+Antibody/pmc03110552-73-16-21
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-α6 integrin rabbit polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bioss rabbit anti integrin α6 subunit
    a , b Total RNA was extracted from 3 NECs (376, 422, and 623) and 3 TECs (isolates cw880, ccf2352, and ccf2390) when similar densities of tubes had formed on Matrigel, and c , d from monolayers of 6 TECs (cw850, cw880, ccf2277, ccf2352, ccf2388, and ccf2390) and 3 NECs (375, 422, and 623), followed by gene expression microarray (HG-U219). a , c Genes upregulated over 2-fold in TECs compared to NECs were subject to gene set enrichment and pathway analysis using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 ( https://david.ncifcrf.gov ), where p -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. b , d Expression profiles of integrins and genes relevant to angiogenesis both on Matrigel and in monolayer are shown as heatmaps; p -values were obtained by two-sided exact-Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. e Cell lysates derived from the same experiment with monolayers of NECs (623, 376, and 422) and TECs (ccf2445, ccf2566, and ccf2515) were subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies in parallel. f Representative confocal images of <t>integrin</t> α3 staining of tubes formed by NECs (376) or TECs (ccf2566) plated on Matrigel (24 h). Graph represents the integrated densities of integrin α3-immunofluorescence. g Paraffin sections of human GBM and normal brain (NB) samples were double-labeled for integrin α3 and vwf, followed by DAPI staining. Representative images shown. Colocalization of the integrin α3 signal with the vwf signal for GBM-sections was 86%, based on the Manders’ Coefficient (M1 = 0.863; M2 = 0.515). h Human GBM tissue arrays containing NB were double-labeled for vwf and integrin α3, CD151, or <t>integrin</t> <t>α6.</t> Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum-tests; red lines denote means and black lines denote 95% confidence intervals. i Tumor sections from mouse glioma were double-labeled by immunofluorescence for integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 and CD31. Average fluorescence intensities of integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 on CD31-positive pixels/field were obtained from tumor or adjacent NB using ImageJ and represented as boxplots. Boxes indicate first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Statistical analysis: linear mixed model; red bars, means. ( h , i ) On the x axis, n = number of different fields. e – g Independent experiments were performed at least two times with similar results. Source data are provided as a source file.
    Rabbit Anti Integrin α6 Subunit, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/ITGA6+Polyclonal+Antibody/pmc09314429-325-17-21
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti integrin α6 subunit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bioss mouse sections rabbit anti integrin α6
    a , b Total RNA was extracted from 3 NECs (376, 422, and 623) and 3 TECs (isolates cw880, ccf2352, and ccf2390) when similar densities of tubes had formed on Matrigel, and c , d from monolayers of 6 TECs (cw850, cw880, ccf2277, ccf2352, ccf2388, and ccf2390) and 3 NECs (375, 422, and 623), followed by gene expression microarray (HG-U219). a , c Genes upregulated over 2-fold in TECs compared to NECs were subject to gene set enrichment and pathway analysis using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 ( https://david.ncifcrf.gov ), where p -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. b , d Expression profiles of integrins and genes relevant to angiogenesis both on Matrigel and in monolayer are shown as heatmaps; p -values were obtained by two-sided exact-Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. e Cell lysates derived from the same experiment with monolayers of NECs (623, 376, and 422) and TECs (ccf2445, ccf2566, and ccf2515) were subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies in parallel. f Representative confocal images of <t>integrin</t> α3 staining of tubes formed by NECs (376) or TECs (ccf2566) plated on Matrigel (24 h). Graph represents the integrated densities of integrin α3-immunofluorescence. g Paraffin sections of human GBM and normal brain (NB) samples were double-labeled for integrin α3 and vwf, followed by DAPI staining. Representative images shown. Colocalization of the integrin α3 signal with the vwf signal for GBM-sections was 86%, based on the Manders’ Coefficient (M1 = 0.863; M2 = 0.515). h Human GBM tissue arrays containing NB were double-labeled for vwf and integrin α3, CD151, or <t>integrin</t> <t>α6.</t> Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum-tests; red lines denote means and black lines denote 95% confidence intervals. i Tumor sections from mouse glioma were double-labeled by immunofluorescence for integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 and CD31. Average fluorescence intensities of integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 on CD31-positive pixels/field were obtained from tumor or adjacent NB using ImageJ and represented as boxplots. Boxes indicate first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Statistical analysis: linear mixed model; red bars, means. ( h , i ) On the x axis, n = number of different fields. e – g Independent experiments were performed at least two times with similar results. Source data are provided as a source file.
    Mouse Sections Rabbit Anti Integrin α6, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/ITGA6+Polyclonal+Antibody/pmc09314429__41467_2022_31981_MOESM2_ESM-62-2-7
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse sections rabbit anti integrin α6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bioss human gbm tissue arrays rabbit anti integrin α6
    a , b Total RNA was extracted from 3 NECs (376, 422, and 623) and 3 TECs (isolates cw880, ccf2352, and ccf2390) when similar densities of tubes had formed on Matrigel, and c , d from monolayers of 6 TECs (cw850, cw880, ccf2277, ccf2352, ccf2388, and ccf2390) and 3 NECs (375, 422, and 623), followed by gene expression microarray (HG-U219). a , c Genes upregulated over 2-fold in TECs compared to NECs were subject to gene set enrichment and pathway analysis using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 ( https://david.ncifcrf.gov ), where p -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. b , d Expression profiles of integrins and genes relevant to angiogenesis both on Matrigel and in monolayer are shown as heatmaps; p -values were obtained by two-sided exact-Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. e Cell lysates derived from the same experiment with monolayers of NECs (623, 376, and 422) and TECs (ccf2445, ccf2566, and ccf2515) were subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies in parallel. f Representative confocal images of <t>integrin</t> α3 staining of tubes formed by NECs (376) or TECs (ccf2566) plated on Matrigel (24 h). Graph represents the integrated densities of integrin α3-immunofluorescence. g Paraffin sections of human GBM and normal brain (NB) samples were double-labeled for integrin α3 and vwf, followed by DAPI staining. Representative images shown. Colocalization of the integrin α3 signal with the vwf signal for GBM-sections was 86%, based on the Manders’ Coefficient (M1 = 0.863; M2 = 0.515). h Human GBM tissue arrays containing NB were double-labeled for vwf and integrin α3, CD151, or <t>integrin</t> <t>α6.</t> Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum-tests; red lines denote means and black lines denote 95% confidence intervals. i Tumor sections from mouse glioma were double-labeled by immunofluorescence for integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 and CD31. Average fluorescence intensities of integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 on CD31-positive pixels/field were obtained from tumor or adjacent NB using ImageJ and represented as boxplots. Boxes indicate first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Statistical analysis: linear mixed model; red bars, means. ( h , i ) On the x axis, n = number of different fields. e – g Independent experiments were performed at least two times with similar results. Source data are provided as a source file.
    Human Gbm Tissue Arrays Rabbit Anti Integrin α6, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/ITGA6+Polyclonal+Antibody/pmc09314429__41467_2022_31981_MOESM2_ESM-58-2-9
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human gbm tissue arrays rabbit anti integrin α6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc polyclonal rabbit anti α6 integrin
    a , b Total RNA was extracted from 3 NECs (376, 422, and 623) and 3 TECs (isolates cw880, ccf2352, and ccf2390) when similar densities of tubes had formed on Matrigel, and c , d from monolayers of 6 TECs (cw850, cw880, ccf2277, ccf2352, ccf2388, and ccf2390) and 3 NECs (375, 422, and 623), followed by gene expression microarray (HG-U219). a , c Genes upregulated over 2-fold in TECs compared to NECs were subject to gene set enrichment and pathway analysis using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 ( https://david.ncifcrf.gov ), where p -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. b , d Expression profiles of integrins and genes relevant to angiogenesis both on Matrigel and in monolayer are shown as heatmaps; p -values were obtained by two-sided exact-Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. e Cell lysates derived from the same experiment with monolayers of NECs (623, 376, and 422) and TECs (ccf2445, ccf2566, and ccf2515) were subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies in parallel. f Representative confocal images of <t>integrin</t> α3 staining of tubes formed by NECs (376) or TECs (ccf2566) plated on Matrigel (24 h). Graph represents the integrated densities of integrin α3-immunofluorescence. g Paraffin sections of human GBM and normal brain (NB) samples were double-labeled for integrin α3 and vwf, followed by DAPI staining. Representative images shown. Colocalization of the integrin α3 signal with the vwf signal for GBM-sections was 86%, based on the Manders’ Coefficient (M1 = 0.863; M2 = 0.515). h Human GBM tissue arrays containing NB were double-labeled for vwf and integrin α3, CD151, or <t>integrin</t> <t>α6.</t> Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum-tests; red lines denote means and black lines denote 95% confidence intervals. i Tumor sections from mouse glioma were double-labeled by immunofluorescence for integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 and CD31. Average fluorescence intensities of integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 on CD31-positive pixels/field were obtained from tumor or adjacent NB using ImageJ and represented as boxplots. Boxes indicate first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Statistical analysis: linear mixed model; red bars, means. ( h , i ) On the x axis, n = number of different fields. e – g Independent experiments were performed at least two times with similar results. Source data are provided as a source file.
    Polyclonal Rabbit Anti α6 Integrin, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/Integrin+alpha6+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2021__08__19__456969-143-22-28
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    polyclonal rabbit anti α6 integrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    OriGene integrins α6
    Immunohistochemical expression of <t>integrins.</t> From the top to bottom: T1, T2, T3, T4. The left column shows H&H stain; the second one represents the Integrin alpha6 expression (strep-ABC—Streptavidine–Biotine–Peroxidase); the right column shows software analysis.
    Integrins α6, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+anti+integrin+%CE%B16/Integrin+alpha+6+(ITGA6)+Rabbit+Polyclonal+Antibody/pmc06121298-115-4-32
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    integrins α6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    PMP22 expression differentially regulates select integrin pairs . The surface expression of α6, αvβ3, or α2 integrin in HEC-1A/PMP22, HEC-1A/Vector, or HEC-1A/PMP22 siRNA cells was determined using flow cytometry. The MFI was quantitated and tabulated in the top corner of each histogram. Upregulation of PMP22 promoted the surface expression of α6 integrin, while slightly reducing αvβ3 integrin. Reciprocal effects were seen with the PMP22 specific siRNA. In contrast, no change in α2 integrin expression was observed when PMP22 expression was modulated. The experiment was repeated three times, and a representative experiment is shown. Statistical differences between α6 integrin (B) and αvβ3 (C) expression were determined between the three cell lines. *, p < 0.05; Student's unpaired t test.

    Journal: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E

    Article Title: Peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP22) modulates alpha 6 integrin expression in the human endometrium

    doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-56

    Figure Lengend Snippet: PMP22 expression differentially regulates select integrin pairs . The surface expression of α6, αvβ3, or α2 integrin in HEC-1A/PMP22, HEC-1A/Vector, or HEC-1A/PMP22 siRNA cells was determined using flow cytometry. The MFI was quantitated and tabulated in the top corner of each histogram. Upregulation of PMP22 promoted the surface expression of α6 integrin, while slightly reducing αvβ3 integrin. Reciprocal effects were seen with the PMP22 specific siRNA. In contrast, no change in α2 integrin expression was observed when PMP22 expression was modulated. The experiment was repeated three times, and a representative experiment is shown. Statistical differences between α6 integrin (B) and αvβ3 (C) expression were determined between the three cell lines. *, p < 0.05; Student's unpaired t test.

    Article Snippet: Pre-cleared lysates were incubated overnight with Protein-A beads bound to either anti-PMP22 rabbit polyclonal antisera (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-α6 integrin rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or control rabbit sera.

    Techniques: Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Flow Cytometry

    PMP22 expression increased binding on laminin . (A) 5 × 10 4 cells (HEC-1A/PMP22, HEC-1A/Vector, HEC-1A/scrambled siRNA control, and HEC-1A/PMP22 siRNA) were incubated in serum-free media at 37°C for 30 min in wells coated with different extracellular matrices. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm. Values are represented as the mean ± SEM. for triplicate wells (* p < 0.05; Student's unpaired t test). A representative experiment is shown; three independent experiments yielded similar results. (B) In order to confirm that laminin binding was α6 integrin dependent, HEC-1A/PMP22 cells were incubated with indicated concentrations of α6 or α2 (control) integrin antibodies. Samples were then plated on laminin for 30 min, and analyzed as above.

    Journal: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E

    Article Title: Peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP22) modulates alpha 6 integrin expression in the human endometrium

    doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-56

    Figure Lengend Snippet: PMP22 expression increased binding on laminin . (A) 5 × 10 4 cells (HEC-1A/PMP22, HEC-1A/Vector, HEC-1A/scrambled siRNA control, and HEC-1A/PMP22 siRNA) were incubated in serum-free media at 37°C for 30 min in wells coated with different extracellular matrices. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm. Values are represented as the mean ± SEM. for triplicate wells (* p < 0.05; Student's unpaired t test). A representative experiment is shown; three independent experiments yielded similar results. (B) In order to confirm that laminin binding was α6 integrin dependent, HEC-1A/PMP22 cells were incubated with indicated concentrations of α6 or α2 (control) integrin antibodies. Samples were then plated on laminin for 30 min, and analyzed as above.

    Article Snippet: Pre-cleared lysates were incubated overnight with Protein-A beads bound to either anti-PMP22 rabbit polyclonal antisera (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-α6 integrin rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or control rabbit sera.

    Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Incubation

    PMP22 and α6 integrin associate with each other . HEC-1A/Vector or HEC-1A/PMP22 cells were lysed in 1% NP-40 and incubated with PMP22 or α6 integrin antisera. Immunoprecipations were assessed by SDS-PAGE analysis. (A) α6 integrin and PMP22 co-immunoprecipitate in HEC-1A/Vector and HEC-1A/PMP22 cells when using either PMP22 or the α6 integrin antibody. Normal rabbit sera were used to assess nonspecific pull-down of proteins. (B) Confocal images of HEC-1A/PMP22 cells after co-immunolabeleing with anti-PMP22 (Rhodamine) and anti-α6 integrin (clone G0H3; FITC) antibodies. Co-localization of PMP22 protein (Rhodamine) with α6 integrin (FITC) was observed in both intracellular and plasma membrane compartments. Scale bar, 10 μM. Insets, 50 μM.

    Journal: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E

    Article Title: Peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP22) modulates alpha 6 integrin expression in the human endometrium

    doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-56

    Figure Lengend Snippet: PMP22 and α6 integrin associate with each other . HEC-1A/Vector or HEC-1A/PMP22 cells were lysed in 1% NP-40 and incubated with PMP22 or α6 integrin antisera. Immunoprecipations were assessed by SDS-PAGE analysis. (A) α6 integrin and PMP22 co-immunoprecipitate in HEC-1A/Vector and HEC-1A/PMP22 cells when using either PMP22 or the α6 integrin antibody. Normal rabbit sera were used to assess nonspecific pull-down of proteins. (B) Confocal images of HEC-1A/PMP22 cells after co-immunolabeleing with anti-PMP22 (Rhodamine) and anti-α6 integrin (clone G0H3; FITC) antibodies. Co-localization of PMP22 protein (Rhodamine) with α6 integrin (FITC) was observed in both intracellular and plasma membrane compartments. Scale bar, 10 μM. Insets, 50 μM.

    Article Snippet: Pre-cleared lysates were incubated overnight with Protein-A beads bound to either anti-PMP22 rabbit polyclonal antisera (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-α6 integrin rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or control rabbit sera.

    Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Incubation, SDS Page

    PMP22 and α6 integrin share a similar pattern of expression in human endometrium . (A, C) Normal human proliferative endometrium was stained by immunohistochemistry for either PMP22 or α6 integrin, respectively. Bound antibodies were visualized using DAB, and nuclei counterstained using hemotoxylin. Magnification: 100X. Insets depict a 400X enlargement of glandular epithelium. (B, D) Normal human secretory endometrium was stained by immunohistochemistry for either PMP22 or α6 integrin as above. Magnification: 100X. Insets depict a 400X enlargement of glandular epithelium. (E) Normal human proliferative endometrium was stained as above using non-specific control rabbit sera. (F) The mean integrated intensity of PMP22 and α6 integrin protein expression was quantitated for each sample; N = 6 per group. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. * p < 0.05.

    Journal: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E

    Article Title: Peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP22) modulates alpha 6 integrin expression in the human endometrium

    doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-56

    Figure Lengend Snippet: PMP22 and α6 integrin share a similar pattern of expression in human endometrium . (A, C) Normal human proliferative endometrium was stained by immunohistochemistry for either PMP22 or α6 integrin, respectively. Bound antibodies were visualized using DAB, and nuclei counterstained using hemotoxylin. Magnification: 100X. Insets depict a 400X enlargement of glandular epithelium. (B, D) Normal human secretory endometrium was stained by immunohistochemistry for either PMP22 or α6 integrin as above. Magnification: 100X. Insets depict a 400X enlargement of glandular epithelium. (E) Normal human proliferative endometrium was stained as above using non-specific control rabbit sera. (F) The mean integrated intensity of PMP22 and α6 integrin protein expression was quantitated for each sample; N = 6 per group. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. * p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: Pre-cleared lysates were incubated overnight with Protein-A beads bound to either anti-PMP22 rabbit polyclonal antisera (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-α6 integrin rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or control rabbit sera.

    Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Immunohistochemistry

    a , b Total RNA was extracted from 3 NECs (376, 422, and 623) and 3 TECs (isolates cw880, ccf2352, and ccf2390) when similar densities of tubes had formed on Matrigel, and c , d from monolayers of 6 TECs (cw850, cw880, ccf2277, ccf2352, ccf2388, and ccf2390) and 3 NECs (375, 422, and 623), followed by gene expression microarray (HG-U219). a , c Genes upregulated over 2-fold in TECs compared to NECs were subject to gene set enrichment and pathway analysis using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 ( https://david.ncifcrf.gov ), where p -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. b , d Expression profiles of integrins and genes relevant to angiogenesis both on Matrigel and in monolayer are shown as heatmaps; p -values were obtained by two-sided exact-Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. e Cell lysates derived from the same experiment with monolayers of NECs (623, 376, and 422) and TECs (ccf2445, ccf2566, and ccf2515) were subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies in parallel. f Representative confocal images of integrin α3 staining of tubes formed by NECs (376) or TECs (ccf2566) plated on Matrigel (24 h). Graph represents the integrated densities of integrin α3-immunofluorescence. g Paraffin sections of human GBM and normal brain (NB) samples were double-labeled for integrin α3 and vwf, followed by DAPI staining. Representative images shown. Colocalization of the integrin α3 signal with the vwf signal for GBM-sections was 86%, based on the Manders’ Coefficient (M1 = 0.863; M2 = 0.515). h Human GBM tissue arrays containing NB were double-labeled for vwf and integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6. Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum-tests; red lines denote means and black lines denote 95% confidence intervals. i Tumor sections from mouse glioma were double-labeled by immunofluorescence for integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 and CD31. Average fluorescence intensities of integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 on CD31-positive pixels/field were obtained from tumor or adjacent NB using ImageJ and represented as boxplots. Boxes indicate first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Statistical analysis: linear mixed model; red bars, means. ( h , i ) On the x axis, n = number of different fields. e – g Independent experiments were performed at least two times with similar results. Source data are provided as a source file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Integrin α3β1 promotes vessel formation of glioblastoma-associated endothelial cells through calcium-mediated macropinocytosis and lysosomal exocytosis

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31981-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Total RNA was extracted from 3 NECs (376, 422, and 623) and 3 TECs (isolates cw880, ccf2352, and ccf2390) when similar densities of tubes had formed on Matrigel, and c , d from monolayers of 6 TECs (cw850, cw880, ccf2277, ccf2352, ccf2388, and ccf2390) and 3 NECs (375, 422, and 623), followed by gene expression microarray (HG-U219). a , c Genes upregulated over 2-fold in TECs compared to NECs were subject to gene set enrichment and pathway analysis using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 ( https://david.ncifcrf.gov ), where p -values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. b , d Expression profiles of integrins and genes relevant to angiogenesis both on Matrigel and in monolayer are shown as heatmaps; p -values were obtained by two-sided exact-Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. e Cell lysates derived from the same experiment with monolayers of NECs (623, 376, and 422) and TECs (ccf2445, ccf2566, and ccf2515) were subjected to western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies in parallel. f Representative confocal images of integrin α3 staining of tubes formed by NECs (376) or TECs (ccf2566) plated on Matrigel (24 h). Graph represents the integrated densities of integrin α3-immunofluorescence. g Paraffin sections of human GBM and normal brain (NB) samples were double-labeled for integrin α3 and vwf, followed by DAPI staining. Representative images shown. Colocalization of the integrin α3 signal with the vwf signal for GBM-sections was 86%, based on the Manders’ Coefficient (M1 = 0.863; M2 = 0.515). h Human GBM tissue arrays containing NB were double-labeled for vwf and integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6. Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum-tests; red lines denote means and black lines denote 95% confidence intervals. i Tumor sections from mouse glioma were double-labeled by immunofluorescence for integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 and CD31. Average fluorescence intensities of integrin α3, CD151, or integrin α6 on CD31-positive pixels/field were obtained from tumor or adjacent NB using ImageJ and represented as boxplots. Boxes indicate first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Statistical analysis: linear mixed model; red bars, means. ( h , i ) On the x axis, n = number of different fields. e – g Independent experiments were performed at least two times with similar results. Source data are provided as a source file.

    Article Snippet: For immunofluoresence analysis of mouse glioma, the primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-integrin α3 subunit (Millipore-Sigma, AB1920), rabbit anti-integrin α6 subunit (Bioss, BS-2641R), rabbit anti-CD151 (Epitomics, 5901-1, clone EP6875) and rat anti-mouse CD31 (Dianova, DIA-310) and the secondary antibodies were Alexa-Fluor-568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A11036) and Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (A21208) from ThermoFisher Scientific.

    Techniques: Expressing, Microarray, Derivative Assay, Western Blot, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Labeling, Fluorescence

    a , c NECs (623) or TECs (isolate ccf2445) were incubated with function blocking antibodies towards the integrin α3 subunit or integrin α6 subunit, or control IgG (mouse IgG or rat IgG) at 5 µg/ml when plated on growth factor-reduced Matrigel in M199 medium +10% FBS for 43 h. Representative images are shown. b , d The mean numbers of tubes or sprouts in the mouse IgG or rat IgG-treated group are represented as 100%. Dot plots show % mean of the numbers of tubes or sprouts (red lines) and the 95% confidence interval (black lines). Statistical analyses: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests. Independent experiments were performed at least two times with similar results. n denotes the number of different fields. b The n for tubes: NECs, n = 12 for mouse IgG and n = 10 for anti-integrin α3; and TECs, n = 12 for mouse IgG and n = 11 for anti-integrin α3. The n for sprouts: TECs, n = 6 for mouse IgG and n = 6 for anti-integrin α3. d The n for tubes: NECs, n = 12 for rat IgG and n = 12 for anti-integrin α6; and TECs, n = 12 for rat IgG and n = 12 for anti-integrin α6. The n for sprouts: TECs, n = 6 for rat IgG and n = 6 for anti-integrin α6. Source data are provided as a source data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Integrin α3β1 promotes vessel formation of glioblastoma-associated endothelial cells through calcium-mediated macropinocytosis and lysosomal exocytosis

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31981-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , c NECs (623) or TECs (isolate ccf2445) were incubated with function blocking antibodies towards the integrin α3 subunit or integrin α6 subunit, or control IgG (mouse IgG or rat IgG) at 5 µg/ml when plated on growth factor-reduced Matrigel in M199 medium +10% FBS for 43 h. Representative images are shown. b , d The mean numbers of tubes or sprouts in the mouse IgG or rat IgG-treated group are represented as 100%. Dot plots show % mean of the numbers of tubes or sprouts (red lines) and the 95% confidence interval (black lines). Statistical analyses: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests. Independent experiments were performed at least two times with similar results. n denotes the number of different fields. b The n for tubes: NECs, n = 12 for mouse IgG and n = 10 for anti-integrin α3; and TECs, n = 12 for mouse IgG and n = 11 for anti-integrin α3. The n for sprouts: TECs, n = 6 for mouse IgG and n = 6 for anti-integrin α3. d The n for tubes: NECs, n = 12 for rat IgG and n = 12 for anti-integrin α6; and TECs, n = 12 for rat IgG and n = 12 for anti-integrin α6. The n for sprouts: TECs, n = 6 for rat IgG and n = 6 for anti-integrin α6. Source data are provided as a source data file.

    Article Snippet: For immunofluoresence analysis of mouse glioma, the primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-integrin α3 subunit (Millipore-Sigma, AB1920), rabbit anti-integrin α6 subunit (Bioss, BS-2641R), rabbit anti-CD151 (Epitomics, 5901-1, clone EP6875) and rat anti-mouse CD31 (Dianova, DIA-310) and the secondary antibodies were Alexa-Fluor-568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A11036) and Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (A21208) from ThermoFisher Scientific.

    Techniques: Incubation, Blocking Assay

    a Schematic diagram of the experimental procedure. Briefly, GBM tumors (ccf4259, ccf4268, ccf4272, and DI247) cut into ~4 mm in diameter were cultured in Matrigel in neurobasal medium supplemented with 1 ng/ml EGF and 1 ng/ml bFGF. On day 2, anti-integrin α3 subunit blocking antibody or control mouse IgG was injected at three places per tumor piece to achieve ~5 µg/ml in tumor volume. The same injection was repeated on day 6. On day 9, tumors were fixed in 10% formalin and paraffin-embedded. Sections were labeled with rabbit anti-CD31 antibody and Alexa-Fluor-488 goat anti-rabbit IgG, followed by DAPI nuclear stain and imaging. b Representative immunofluorescent images from organotypic culture of tumor ccf4272 are shown. c Percent CD31-positive area per field was obtained by image processing using ImageJ. n denotes the number of different fields, for ccf4269, n = 44 for mouse IgG and n = 95 for anti-integrin α3; for ccf4268, n = 39 for mouse IgG and n = 103 for anti-integrin α3; for ccf4272, n = 57 for mouse IgG and n = 82 for anti-integrin α3; for DI-247, n = 59 for mouse IgG and n = 88 for anti-integrin α3. The boxes indicate the first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and the whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. A linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis ( p < 0.001). Source data are provided as a source data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Integrin α3β1 promotes vessel formation of glioblastoma-associated endothelial cells through calcium-mediated macropinocytosis and lysosomal exocytosis

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31981-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic diagram of the experimental procedure. Briefly, GBM tumors (ccf4259, ccf4268, ccf4272, and DI247) cut into ~4 mm in diameter were cultured in Matrigel in neurobasal medium supplemented with 1 ng/ml EGF and 1 ng/ml bFGF. On day 2, anti-integrin α3 subunit blocking antibody or control mouse IgG was injected at three places per tumor piece to achieve ~5 µg/ml in tumor volume. The same injection was repeated on day 6. On day 9, tumors were fixed in 10% formalin and paraffin-embedded. Sections were labeled with rabbit anti-CD31 antibody and Alexa-Fluor-488 goat anti-rabbit IgG, followed by DAPI nuclear stain and imaging. b Representative immunofluorescent images from organotypic culture of tumor ccf4272 are shown. c Percent CD31-positive area per field was obtained by image processing using ImageJ. n denotes the number of different fields, for ccf4269, n = 44 for mouse IgG and n = 95 for anti-integrin α3; for ccf4268, n = 39 for mouse IgG and n = 103 for anti-integrin α3; for ccf4272, n = 57 for mouse IgG and n = 82 for anti-integrin α3; for DI-247, n = 59 for mouse IgG and n = 88 for anti-integrin α3. The boxes indicate the first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and the whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. A linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis ( p < 0.001). Source data are provided as a source data file.

    Article Snippet: For immunofluoresence analysis of mouse glioma, the primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-integrin α3 subunit (Millipore-Sigma, AB1920), rabbit anti-integrin α6 subunit (Bioss, BS-2641R), rabbit anti-CD151 (Epitomics, 5901-1, clone EP6875) and rat anti-mouse CD31 (Dianova, DIA-310) and the secondary antibodies were Alexa-Fluor-568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A11036) and Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (A21208) from ThermoFisher Scientific.

    Techniques: Cell Culture, Blocking Assay, Injection, Labeling, Staining, Imaging

    a NECs (422 and 623) and TECs (isolates ccf3889, DI-167, and DI-337) were incubated with 25 µg/ml TMR-dex for 30 min, followed by imaging. n denotes the number of different fields: NECs, n = 20 for 422 and n = 20 for 623; and TECs, n = 30 for each isolate. Representative images are shown. Macropinocytosis Index was defined as (total TMR-dex area/total cell area) x 100 per field and Macropinosome Number was defined as the average number of macropinosomes in a cell per field. Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests. Correlation between Macropinocytosis Index and Macropinosome Number was analyzed by linear regression model after adjusting for group effect; shaded area in the correlation graph represents the 95% confidence band for the regression line. b TECs (isolate ccf2390) treated with DMSO (vehicle-control; n = 11) or 100 nM EIPA ( n = 11) for 10 min were subsequently incubated with TMR-dex for 30 min, followed by imaging. Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. c Tube formation of TECs (isolates cf2390 and ccf2687) was quantitated by the numbers of tubes formed per field on Matrigel after 6 h in M199 + 10% FBS in the presence of DMSO (vehicle-control; n = 18 for ccf2390, and n = 18 for ccf2687) or 50 nM EIPA ( n = 18 for ccf2390, and n = 18 for ccf2687). Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. d , e TECs (isolate ccf2390) were pretreated for 3 h with blocking antibody toward integrin α3 ( n = 23) or mouse IgG ( n = 23) and TECs (isolate DI-102) were pretreated with blocking antibody toward CD151 ( n = 11) or mouse IgG ( n = 9), and then TECs were incubated for 30 min with TMR-dex. Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. f Shown are immunoblots of integrin α3 and CD151 from TECs (isolate ccf3889) at 48 h after transfection with siRNA for integrin α3 or CD151. These immunoblots were performed at least two times, and cell lysate samples loaded in separate lanes were from independent replicates. At 48 h after transfection with siRNA, TECs (isolate ccf3889) were incubated with TMR-dex for 15 min. n = number of different fields: integrin α3, n = 16 for siintegrin α3-1 and n = 16 for siintegrin α3-2; CD151, n = 17 for siCD151; and control siRNA, n = 16. Representative images are shown. Statistical analysis: Dunn-method for pairwise-comparisons between each siRNA with ConRi. Boxes indicate the first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Dotted lines denote means in a – f . Source data are provided as a source data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Integrin α3β1 promotes vessel formation of glioblastoma-associated endothelial cells through calcium-mediated macropinocytosis and lysosomal exocytosis

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31981-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a NECs (422 and 623) and TECs (isolates ccf3889, DI-167, and DI-337) were incubated with 25 µg/ml TMR-dex for 30 min, followed by imaging. n denotes the number of different fields: NECs, n = 20 for 422 and n = 20 for 623; and TECs, n = 30 for each isolate. Representative images are shown. Macropinocytosis Index was defined as (total TMR-dex area/total cell area) x 100 per field and Macropinosome Number was defined as the average number of macropinosomes in a cell per field. Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests. Correlation between Macropinocytosis Index and Macropinosome Number was analyzed by linear regression model after adjusting for group effect; shaded area in the correlation graph represents the 95% confidence band for the regression line. b TECs (isolate ccf2390) treated with DMSO (vehicle-control; n = 11) or 100 nM EIPA ( n = 11) for 10 min were subsequently incubated with TMR-dex for 30 min, followed by imaging. Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. c Tube formation of TECs (isolates cf2390 and ccf2687) was quantitated by the numbers of tubes formed per field on Matrigel after 6 h in M199 + 10% FBS in the presence of DMSO (vehicle-control; n = 18 for ccf2390, and n = 18 for ccf2687) or 50 nM EIPA ( n = 18 for ccf2390, and n = 18 for ccf2687). Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. d , e TECs (isolate ccf2390) were pretreated for 3 h with blocking antibody toward integrin α3 ( n = 23) or mouse IgG ( n = 23) and TECs (isolate DI-102) were pretreated with blocking antibody toward CD151 ( n = 11) or mouse IgG ( n = 9), and then TECs were incubated for 30 min with TMR-dex. Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum test. f Shown are immunoblots of integrin α3 and CD151 from TECs (isolate ccf3889) at 48 h after transfection with siRNA for integrin α3 or CD151. These immunoblots were performed at least two times, and cell lysate samples loaded in separate lanes were from independent replicates. At 48 h after transfection with siRNA, TECs (isolate ccf3889) were incubated with TMR-dex for 15 min. n = number of different fields: integrin α3, n = 16 for siintegrin α3-1 and n = 16 for siintegrin α3-2; CD151, n = 17 for siCD151; and control siRNA, n = 16. Representative images are shown. Statistical analysis: Dunn-method for pairwise-comparisons between each siRNA with ConRi. Boxes indicate the first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Dotted lines denote means in a – f . Source data are provided as a source data file.

    Article Snippet: For immunofluoresence analysis of mouse glioma, the primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-integrin α3 subunit (Millipore-Sigma, AB1920), rabbit anti-integrin α6 subunit (Bioss, BS-2641R), rabbit anti-CD151 (Epitomics, 5901-1, clone EP6875) and rat anti-mouse CD31 (Dianova, DIA-310) and the secondary antibodies were Alexa-Fluor-568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A11036) and Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (A21208) from ThermoFisher Scientific.

    Techniques: Incubation, Imaging, Blocking Assay, Western Blot, Transfection

    a LAMP1 was labelled after TECs (isolate ccf2390) were incubated with 25 µg/ml TMR-dex for 3 h at 37 °C, followed by fixation and permeabilization. Representative images shown; yellow arrows indicate TMR-dex and LAMP1 co-localization. Colocalization was 99% based on the Manders’ Coefficient (M1 = 0.999; M2 = 0.058). Independent experiments were performed at least two-times with similar results. b Experimental-procedure schematic for c , d . Adherent TECs (isolate ccf3889) were incubated with 100 µg/ml TMR-dex for 15 min at 37 °C, washed, harvested, labeled with 5 µg/ml Alexa-Fluor-647-conjugated-WGA in suspension, washed and plated on Matrigel for 20 h. Representative 3-D ( c ) and cross-sectional ( d ) images of tubes. e , f Adherent TECs (isolate ccf2390) were incubated with 100 µg/ml TMR-dex for 15 min at 37 °C, washed, harvested, and plated on Matrigel for 3 h with ( n = 12) or without 0.5 mM EGTA ( n = 10) ( e ), or in the presence of mouse IgG ( n = 21) or integrin α3 antibody ( n = 21) ( f ), followed by fixation and labeling with the LAMP1 mAb, H4A3. g TECs (isolate ccf3889) either in DMEM + 5% FBS (control media) or in calcium-free media were treated with ( n = 20) or without 0.5 mM EGTA ( n = 20) for 15 min, and then incubated with 100 µg/ml TMR-dex for 15 min at 37 °C, and fixed. Representative images are shown for panels e – g . h TECs (isolate ccf3889) in DMEM + 5% FBS were incubated on Matrigel with ( n = 36) or without 0.5 mM EGTA ( n = 36) for 18 h. g , h Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests. n = number of different fields. Boxes indicate first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Dotted lines denote means. i , j Increase of intracellular Ca 2+ by extracellular Ca 2+ influx was measured by fluorescence intensity of Fluo-8 (Ex/Em = 490/525). To deplete intracellular calcium storage, TECs (isolate DI-102) were treated with 1 µM of Thapsigargin (TH) before addition of extracellular CaCl2 to the medium. Data points indicate means of 3-replicates, and bars denote standard errors. j TECs (isolate DI-102) were preincubated with mouse IgG or blocking anti-integrin α3 antibody, followed by addition of TH and CaCl2. Statistical analysis: linear mixed model. k Proposed TEC tube-formation model. TEC tube-formation mechanism requires macropinocytosis and lysosomal exocytosis. Source data are provided as a source data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Integrin α3β1 promotes vessel formation of glioblastoma-associated endothelial cells through calcium-mediated macropinocytosis and lysosomal exocytosis

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31981-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a LAMP1 was labelled after TECs (isolate ccf2390) were incubated with 25 µg/ml TMR-dex for 3 h at 37 °C, followed by fixation and permeabilization. Representative images shown; yellow arrows indicate TMR-dex and LAMP1 co-localization. Colocalization was 99% based on the Manders’ Coefficient (M1 = 0.999; M2 = 0.058). Independent experiments were performed at least two-times with similar results. b Experimental-procedure schematic for c , d . Adherent TECs (isolate ccf3889) were incubated with 100 µg/ml TMR-dex for 15 min at 37 °C, washed, harvested, labeled with 5 µg/ml Alexa-Fluor-647-conjugated-WGA in suspension, washed and plated on Matrigel for 20 h. Representative 3-D ( c ) and cross-sectional ( d ) images of tubes. e , f Adherent TECs (isolate ccf2390) were incubated with 100 µg/ml TMR-dex for 15 min at 37 °C, washed, harvested, and plated on Matrigel for 3 h with ( n = 12) or without 0.5 mM EGTA ( n = 10) ( e ), or in the presence of mouse IgG ( n = 21) or integrin α3 antibody ( n = 21) ( f ), followed by fixation and labeling with the LAMP1 mAb, H4A3. g TECs (isolate ccf3889) either in DMEM + 5% FBS (control media) or in calcium-free media were treated with ( n = 20) or without 0.5 mM EGTA ( n = 20) for 15 min, and then incubated with 100 µg/ml TMR-dex for 15 min at 37 °C, and fixed. Representative images are shown for panels e – g . h TECs (isolate ccf3889) in DMEM + 5% FBS were incubated on Matrigel with ( n = 36) or without 0.5 mM EGTA ( n = 36) for 18 h. g , h Statistical analysis: two-sided Wilcoxon-rank-sum tests. n = number of different fields. Boxes indicate first and third quartiles, bands indicate medians, and whiskers indicate ±1.5 interquartile range. Dotted lines denote means. i , j Increase of intracellular Ca 2+ by extracellular Ca 2+ influx was measured by fluorescence intensity of Fluo-8 (Ex/Em = 490/525). To deplete intracellular calcium storage, TECs (isolate DI-102) were treated with 1 µM of Thapsigargin (TH) before addition of extracellular CaCl2 to the medium. Data points indicate means of 3-replicates, and bars denote standard errors. j TECs (isolate DI-102) were preincubated with mouse IgG or blocking anti-integrin α3 antibody, followed by addition of TH and CaCl2. Statistical analysis: linear mixed model. k Proposed TEC tube-formation model. TEC tube-formation mechanism requires macropinocytosis and lysosomal exocytosis. Source data are provided as a source data file.

    Article Snippet: For immunofluoresence analysis of mouse glioma, the primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-integrin α3 subunit (Millipore-Sigma, AB1920), rabbit anti-integrin α6 subunit (Bioss, BS-2641R), rabbit anti-CD151 (Epitomics, 5901-1, clone EP6875) and rat anti-mouse CD31 (Dianova, DIA-310) and the secondary antibodies were Alexa-Fluor-568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A11036) and Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (A21208) from ThermoFisher Scientific.

    Techniques: Incubation, Labeling, Fluorescence, Blocking Assay

    Immunohistochemical expression of integrins. From the top to bottom: T1, T2, T3, T4. The left column shows H&H stain; the second one represents the Integrin alpha6 expression (strep-ABC—Streptavidine–Biotine–Peroxidase); the right column shows software analysis.

    Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

    Article Title: Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues around Machined and Direct Metal Laser Sintered (DMLS) Healing Abutments in Humans

    doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081611

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemical expression of integrins. From the top to bottom: T1, T2, T3, T4. The left column shows H&H stain; the second one represents the Integrin alpha6 expression (strep-ABC—Streptavidine–Biotine–Peroxidase); the right column shows software analysis.

    Article Snippet: The immunohistochemical staining of integrins α6 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, for human use, in paraffine sections) and CD20, CD3, CD68, and CD31 (specific markers of inflammation) was performed using the strep-ABC (Streptavidine–Biotine–Peroxidase) method (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). α6 was chosen to evaluate the amount of expression of the integrins as it represents the main component of hemidesmosomes.

    Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Expressing, Staining, Software

    Graphical representation of α6 integrins in different groups. Statistically significant differences between groups were found.

    Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

    Article Title: Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues around Machined and Direct Metal Laser Sintered (DMLS) Healing Abutments in Humans

    doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081611

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Graphical representation of α6 integrins in different groups. Statistically significant differences between groups were found.

    Article Snippet: The immunohistochemical staining of integrins α6 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, for human use, in paraffine sections) and CD20, CD3, CD68, and CD31 (specific markers of inflammation) was performed using the strep-ABC (Streptavidine–Biotine–Peroxidase) method (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). α6 was chosen to evaluate the amount of expression of the integrins as it represents the main component of hemidesmosomes.

    Techniques:

    Mean and SD of  integrins  expression in different groups.

    Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

    Article Title: Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues around Machined and Direct Metal Laser Sintered (DMLS) Healing Abutments in Humans

    doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081611

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean and SD of integrins expression in different groups.

    Article Snippet: The immunohistochemical staining of integrins α6 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, for human use, in paraffine sections) and CD20, CD3, CD68, and CD31 (specific markers of inflammation) was performed using the strep-ABC (Streptavidine–Biotine–Peroxidase) method (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). α6 was chosen to evaluate the amount of expression of the integrins as it represents the main component of hemidesmosomes.

    Techniques: Expressing